Thursday 14 May 2009

50 word or less about me info 4 catalogue


Well how to best describe myself designer in a couple of words who is Peter Mambo-Ange Pitra I see myself as a person that I am only complete when I’m able to express myself through my design work. my deeps ideas come through my work. To live and die in design the rest is not important.

Monday 11 May 2009


someone that i met and view his idea was david skopec

Thursday 7 May 2009




Gerd Arntz (1900-1988)

Already as a young man, born in a German family of traders and manufacturers, Gerd Arntz was a socially inspired and politically committed artist. In Düsseldorf, where he lived since his nineteenth, he joined a movement which wanted to turn Germany into a ‘soviet-’ or ‘council republic’, a radically socialist state form based on direct popular democracy. As a revolutionary artist, Arntz was connected to the Cologne based ‘progressive artists group’ (Gruppe progressiver Künstler Köln) and depicted the life of workers and the class struggle in abstracted figures on woodcuts. Published in leftist magazines, his work was noticed by Otto Neurath, a social scientist and founder of the Museum of Society and Economy (Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsmuseum) in Vienna, Austria. Neurath had developed a method to communicate complex information on society, economy and politics in simple images. For his ‘Vienna method of visual statistics’, he needed a designer who could make elementary signs, pictograms that could summarize a subject at a glance.

i was look at pictograms or illustration that communicate to a wide mass

Society and our divides be it colour,sex,clothes,life styles

are we program to hate or do we grow to hate that is the purpose of my project to see if we can break the chain for the next generation grow as a responsible design i look at thing in a different way but at the same time have to be honest that society has come a long way in bring people together but where still along way form have a perfect word where each person is treat the same and measure on what they can do.

nature versus nurture

The nature versus nurture debates concern the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature", i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences ("nurture", i.e. empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in physical and behavioral traits.

The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from "nurture" is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate"). This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, many modern psychologists consider the question naive - representing an outdated state of knowledge.[1][2][3][4][5] Psychologist Donald Hebb is said to have once answered a journalist's question of "which, nature or nurture, contributes more to personality?" by asking in response, "which contributes more to the area of a rectangle, its length or its width?"[6][7][8][9]

For a discussion of nature versus nurture in language and other human universals, see also psychological nativism.

Wednesday 6 May 2009



My proposal for my final major project

For my final FMP I want to create a poster and a book about racism that focuses on young children that in it forms about how we are all one people.
The main aim for the project is to educate young minds

The book is going to contain illustration that informs and communicate what I am trying to say.
The poster is going to contain illustration

The size of the poster is going to be A0 841 × 1189

The Shelf white that going to be next to the main poster

The size of the book is going to be 210 × 297